Strong Service Quality Amid Procedural Challenges: A Mixed-Methods Study of the Business Permits and Licensing Office of Pasay City, Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.22Keywords:
service quality, SERVQUAL, business permits and licensing, local government, Ease of Doing Business, mixed methods, PhilippinesAbstract
The Business Permits and Licensing Office (BPLO) is one of the most visible frontline offices of a Philippine local government unit (LGU). Republic Act No. 11032 requires LGUs to deliver faster, simpler and more transparent business permitting, yet compliance has been uneven across cities. This study assessed perceived service quality and client-reported challenges at the BPLO of Pasay City. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used. In the quantitative phase, 100 clients, selected by convenience sampling, completed a validated questionnaire (S-CVI/Ave = 0.97; Cronbach’s α = 0.915 in a pilot of 20) covering the five SERVQUAL dimensions and three challenge domains (processing time, documentary requirements, accessibility of services). Means and standard deviations described the scores; Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis H tests compared service quality across respondent profiles (α = .05). In the qualitative phase, 15 respondents were interviewed, and the transcripts were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis. Service quality was rated Very High on every dimension (M = 4.31–4.39), with tangibles highest (4.39) and responsiveness lowest (4.31). Clients nevertheless reported High challenges in accessibility of services (M = 3.68) and processing time (M = 3.43), and a Moderate challenge in documentary requirements (M = 3.26). Service quality did not differ significantly by age, sex, civil status, education, type of business, nature of transaction or frequency of transaction (all p > .05). Three themes explained the survey results: lengthy processing time (13 of 15 participants), need for improved service accessibility (12 of 15) and complex documentary requirements (11 of 15). Clients judged BPLO personnel and facilities very favorably, while the problems they described concerned procedures rather than people. Streamlining steps, publishing complete requirement checklists and expanding online channels are the most evidence-supported improvements.
References
Acuña, V., & Cerado, E. (2026). Service quality and client satisfaction in the public sector: An empirical assessment of the Philippine Social Security System using the SERVQUAL framework. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 63(1). https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v63i1.974 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v63i1.974
Alindajao, R. A., et al. (2023). Impacts of digitization of business permits and licenses in District 3, Quezon City. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.08.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.08.30
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Congress of the Philippines. (2018). Republic Act No. 11032: Ease of Doing Business and Efficient Government Service Delivery Act of 2018. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2018/05/28/republic-act-no-11032/
Development Academy of the Philippines. (2024). Institutionalization of Service Quality Standards. https://www.dap.edu.ph
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Ocampo, L., Alinsub, J., Casul, R. A., Enquig, G., Luar, M., Panuncillon, N., Bongo, M., & Ocampo, C. O. (2019). Public service quality evaluation with SERVQUAL and AHP-TOPSIS: A case of Philippine government agencies. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 68, 100604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.12.002
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Prof. Rev. Norberto R. Paranga Jr., PhD, Th.D., DPA, Prof. Joan A. Ruallo, MBA, Cathy S. Bariga, Elpidio T. Cammagay (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. This license permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
