Outcome-Based Instructional Coaching to Strengthen Teacher Professional Development

Authors

  • Roel C. Buñao Master of Arts in Education, Major in Administration and Supervision, Cebu Technical University, Cebu City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.30

Keywords:

Classroom Observation, Educational Sustainability, Instructional Coaching, Learning Action Cells, Professional Development, Public Secondary Schools, Reflective Teaching

Abstract

This study examined the extent of instructional coaching implementation and its relationship with teacher professional development among public secondary school teachers in Carmen I District, Bohol, Philippines. A quantitative descriptive-correlational design was employed, involving 50 teachers from three schools through total enumeration during School Year 2026–2027. Data were collected using a content-validated structured questionnaire and analyzed through descriptive statistics and Pearson product-moment correlation. Instructional coaching was generally implemented (WM = 4.16), with classroom observation (WM = 4.29) and post-observation feedback (WM = 4.23) receiving the highest ratings. Teacher professional development was likewise favorably perceived (WM = 4.19), particularly in content knowledge and pedagogy (WM = 4.28) and reflective teaching (WM = 4.27). A statistically significant positive, low-to-moderate relationship was established between instructional coaching and professional development (r = 0.35, p = 0.014). However, progress monitoring and documentation (WM = 4.06) and assessment-related competencies (WM = 4.09) emerged as priority areas for improvement. The findings indicate that stronger coaching implementation is associated with higher perceived professional development without establishing causation. Schools should strengthen coaching follow-through, systematic progress monitoring, and targeted Learning Action Cell mentoring. The geographically limited sample and reliance on self-reported data constrain generalizability. By identifying actionable gaps in instructional support, the study provides an empirical basis for enhancing school-based professional learning and promoting educational sustainability aligned with Sustainable Development Goal 4: Quality Education.

References

Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2023). Empowering principals to conduct classroom observations in a centralized education system: Does it make a difference for teacher self-efficacy and instructional practices? International Journal of Educational Management, 37(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2022-0086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2022-0086

Craig, S. L., Smith, S. J., & Frey, B. B. (2022). Effects of coaching on Universal Design for Learning implementation. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 11(4), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-01-2022-0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-01-2022-0001

Dela Cruz, J. B., & Baguio, J. B. (2024). Exploring the predictors of successful Learning Action Cell practices of special education teachers. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(10), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i101625 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i101625

Department of Education. (2022). Adoption of the Basic Education Development Plan 2030 (DepEd Order No. 024, s. 2022). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/DO_s2022_024.pdf

Department of Education. (2023a). Interim guidelines for the quality assurance and monitoring and evaluation of the National Educators Academy of the Philippines core programs (DepEd Memorandum No. 044, s. 2023). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DM_s2023_044.pdf

Department of Education. (2023b). Multi-year guidelines on the Results-Based Performance Management System–Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (DepEd Memorandum No. 008, s. 2023). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DM_s2023_008.pdf

Glover, T. A., Reddy, L. A., & Crouse, K. (2023). Instructional coaching actions that predict teacher classroom practices and student achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 96, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.10.006

Jolly, A. C., Beach, K. D., Aiken, H. H., & Amendum, S. J. (2024). The development and pilot of an observation tool to examine behaviors of instructional coaches. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 34(2), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2023.2227166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2023.2227166

Jurkowski, S., & Abramczyk, A. (2024). Collaboration in in-service teacher training—The missing link between empirical evidence and practice? Journal of Education for Teaching, 50(4), 550–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2024.2327062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2024.2327062

LaBrot, Z. C., Smith, T., Maxime, E., & Lawson, A. (2024). School-based consultation and coaching for promoting teachers' generalized outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 107, Article 101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101379

Learning Forward. (2022). Standards for professional learning. https://standards.learningforward.org/standards-for-professional-learning/

Özdemir, M., Eriçok, B., Topaloğlu, H., & Tuti, G. (2024). Transformational leadership and job satisfaction in vocational high schools in Türkiye: A multilevel mediation model of teacher professional learning and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Administration, 62(3), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2023-0200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2023-0200

Rivera, J. P. R., Sinsay-Villanueva, L. M. V., Tanyag, I. H., Berroya, J. D., Garcia, G. D. V., & Lim, V. L. (2025). Revitalizing the Philippine education system: Facilitating access and participation to in-service training (INSET) and teacher professional development (TPD) (Discussion Paper No. 2025-14). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2025.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2025.14

Sims, S., Fletcher-Wood, H., O'Mara-Eves, A., Cottingham, S., Stansfield, C., Goodrich, J., Van Herwegen, J., & Anders, J. (2025). Effective teacher professional development: New theory and a meta-analytic test. Review of Educational Research, 95(2), 213–254. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231217480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231217480

UNESCO & International Task Force on Teachers for Education 2030. (2024). Global report on teachers: Addressing teacher shortages and transforming the profession. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789231006555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/9789231006555

Visscher, A. J., Dmoshinskaia, N., Pellegrini, M., & Rey-Naizaque, A. (2025). (When) do teacher professional development interventions improve student achievement? A meta-analysis of 128 high-quality studies. Educational Research Review, 49, Article 100742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100742

Warnock, J. M., Gibson-Sweet, M., & van Nieuwerburgh, C. J. (2022). The perceived benefits of instructional coaching for teachers. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 11(3), 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-01-2021-0030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-01-2021-0030

White, M., & Maher, B. L. (2024). How might rubric-based observations better support teacher learning and development? Educational Research, 66(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2024.2304542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2024.2304542

Downloads

Published

2026-11-04

How to Cite

Buñao, R. C. (2026). Outcome-Based Instructional Coaching to Strengthen Teacher Professional Development. International Journal of Global Goals and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 317-326. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.30