Phonological Awareness as a Predictor of Reading Fluency and Oral Proficiency among Senior High School Students: Basis for an Intervention Program  

Authors

  • Jonard Aquino Cardinal Master of Arts in Education - Major in English, University of Perpetual Help System DALTA - Las Piñas City Campus, Las Piñas City, Metro Manila, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.32

Keywords:

Grade 12, Intervention Program, Oral Proficiency, Phoneme Segmentation, Phonological Awareness, Reading Fluency

Abstract

This study examined whether phonological awareness predicted reading fluency and oral proficiency among Grade 12 Strengthened Senior High School students and used the findings to develop a proposed intervention program. A quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive-correlational design with comparative and predictive components was employed among 196 students selected through stratified random sampling from Las Piñas City National Senior High School–Doña Josefa Campus. Researcher-developed assessments measured phonological awareness, oral reading, and speaking performance; data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, group comparisons, Pearson correlation, and separate simple linear regressions. Phonological awareness was rated high (M = 20.79), although phoneme segmentation was the weakest component. Reading accuracy was strong (M = 96.39%), whereas prosodic reading remained developing (M = 2.29). Overall oral proficiency was developing (M = 2.24), with communicative strategies scoring lowest. Significant differences emerged across sex, section, track, and elective cluster. Phonological awareness correlated positively with reading fluency (r = .4425) and oral proficiency (r = .4642), explaining approximately 20% and 22% of their respective variance in separate regression models (p < .001). These results identify phonological awareness as a significant but noncausal statistical predictor of both outcomes. A pilot of the proposed SOUND TO SPEECH program is recommended to address phoneme segmentation, prosody, interaction, coherence, and communication strategies. The single-school, non-experimental design and researcher-developed instruments limit generalizability and causal inference. By identifying interconnected language-learning needs, the study offers school-based evidence for targeted instruction and advances SDG 4 through its potential contribution to equitable, sustainable literacy and communication development.

 

References

Abd Rahman, N. (2024). Impact of task-based language teaching (TBLT) on English spoken production and interaction among Malaysian pre-university students. Issues in Language Studies, 13(2), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.6203.2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.6203.2024

Alzahrani, A., & Algethami, G. (2023). Phonological awareness and word reading fluency among young Saudi learners of English. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 5(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i1.1183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i1.1183

Azis, A. H. M., Rum, E. P., & Mahmudah, D. R. (2023). An analysis of EFL students' communication strategies in classroom context. Journal of Language Testing and Assessment, 3(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.56983/jlta.v3i2.930 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56983/jlta.v3i2.930

Burns, M. K., Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2023). Evaluating components of the active view of reading as intervention targets: Implications for social justice. School Psychology, 38(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000519

Chattamvelli, R. (2024). Correlation in engineering and the applied sciences: Applications in R. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51015-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51015-1

Chou, M.-H. (2024). Communication strategies, difficulties, and speaking tasks in foreign language learning. SAGE Open, 14(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241266324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241266324

Council of Europe. (2024). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment—Companion volume with international sign language translation. https://www.coe.int/en/web/education/-/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching-assessment-14

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

de Jong, N. H. (2023). Assessing second language speaking proficiency. Annual Review of Linguistics, 9, 541–560. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030521-052114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030521-052114

Ehri, L. C. (2022). What teachers need to know and do to teach letter–sounds, phonemic awareness, word reading, and phonics. The Reading Teacher, 76(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2095

Eremicheva, T., Nikonova, Y., & Alexeeva, S. (2025). Phonological processing skills influence text-reading fluency in Russian-speaking adolescents. PLOS ONE, 20(12), Article e0337614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337614

Fajar, M., Aprilianto, M. H., & Sulistyowati, H. (2023). The proficiency of oral language and phonological awareness in adult EFL students. JET (Journal of English Teaching) Adi Buana, 8(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.36456/jet.v8.n02.2023.8118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36456/jet.v8.n02.2023.8118

Hwang, I. (2025). Exploring the relationship between textbook-based oral reading fluency and L2 reading comprehension among Korean EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 37(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.17936/pKELT.2025.37.1.003

Jiang, Y., Gai, X., Üstün-Yavuz, M. S., Zhang, M., & Thomson, J. M. (2023). A meta-analysis of training effects on English phonological awareness and reading in native Chinese speakers. PsyCh Journal, 12(5), 599–617. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.675

Jiang, Y., Gai, X., Wang, Z., & Thomson, J. (2024). The influence of segmental and suprasegmental phonological awareness on word and pseudoword reading—A comparison between native English speakers and native Chinese speakers of English. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1214197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1214197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1214197

Mugwe, J. N., & Runo, S. (2026). Research methodology in agricultural sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-1892-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-1892-0

North, B. (2023). The CEFR Companion Volume and the action-oriented approach. Italiano LinguaDue, 14(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-3597/19566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-3597/19566

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II)—Country notes: Philippines. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/philippines_a0882a2d-en.html

Prabhu, M., Shwetha, P., & Somashekara, H. S. (2024). Phonological awareness and alphabetic knowledge in typically developing English language learners between the 3.6 to 6.6 years. Reading Psychology, 45(3), 242–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2276463 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2276463

Quadri, J., Masson, J., & Poncelet, M. (2024). The effect of a reading aloud program on reading rate and reading prosody in a group of sixth-grade low-achievement, language-minority, and/or low-SES readers. Reading and Writing, 37, 1289–1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10443-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10443-1

Rice, M., Erbeli, F., Thompson, C. G., Sallese, M. R., & Fogarty, M. (2022). Phonemic awareness: A meta-analysis for planning effective instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(4), 1259–1289. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.473

Sáez, L., Whitney, M., Nese, J. F. T., Alonzo, J., & Nese, R. N. T. (2025). Reading prosody: A listening guide for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 78(4), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2368

Shhub, A., Jimenez, Z., & Solis, M. (2023). A synthesis of reading prosody: Evaluating phrasing and syntax interventions. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 39(6), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2022.2147464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2022.2147464

Tsunemoto, A., & Trofimovich, P. (2024). Coherence and comprehensibility in second language speakers' academic speaking performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46(3), 795–817. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263124000305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263124000305

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2024). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2024. United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2024/

Webber, C., Patel, H., Cunningham, A., Fox, A., Vousden, J., Castles, A., & Shapiro, L. (2024). An experimental comparison of additional training in phoneme awareness, letter-sound knowledge and decoding for struggling beginner readers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 282–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12641

Wilang, J. D., Seepho, S., & Kitjaroonchai, N. (2025). Exploring the relationship of reading fluency and accuracy in L2 learning: Insights from a reading assistant software. Education Sciences, 15(4), Article 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040488

Winarto, E. R., & Aprianti, F. (2023). Applying gender differences in phonological awareness to enhance students' reading ability. English Review: Journal of English Education, 11(3), 991–1000. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i3.8216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i3.8216

Downloads

Published

2026-11-05

How to Cite

Cardinal, J. A. (2026). Phonological Awareness as a Predictor of Reading Fluency and Oral Proficiency among Senior High School Students: Basis for an Intervention Program  . International Journal of Global Goals and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.32