Blended Instruction in Technology Livelihood Education: Implementation, Effectiveness, and Challenges Encountered by Grade 10 Dressmaking Students

Authors

  • Jessa Marie D. Alcala Master of Arts in Teaching Vocational Education, Major in Garments Technology, Bohol Island State University – Main Campus, Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.40

Keywords:

Blended Instruction, TLE Dressmaking, Competency Development, Perceived Effectiveness, Instructional Enhancement Plan

Abstract

This study examined the perceived effectiveness of blended instruction in developing competencies in Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) Dressmaking among Junior High School students in the First Congressional District of Bohol during School Year 2026–2027. Specifically, it determined the level of implementation of blended instruction, its effectiveness in developing knowledge acquisition, skills performance, and work attitudes, and the challenges encountered by teachers and learners. The study employed a convergent parallel mixed-methods design involving 98 Grade 10 learners and 12 TLE Dressmaking teachers. Quantitative data were gathered using a researcher-made questionnaire with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.956, while qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Findings revealed that blended instruction was Highly Implemented (WM = 3.45). Among learners, Skill Performance obtained the highest mean (WM = 3.51), while Learning Environment Conditions obtained the lowest (WM = 3.33). Among teachers, Knowledge Acquisition obtained the highest mean (WM = 3.55), while Learning Environment Conditions obtained the lowest (WM = 3.27). Blended instruction was also perceived as Very Effective (Learners: WM = 3.42; Teachers: WM = 3.34). Work Attitudes obtained the highest ratings among learners (WM = 3.46) and teachers (WM = 3.38). The challenges encountered were rated Moderately Challenged (Learners: WM = 3.10; Teachers: WM = 2.99). A significant moderate positive relationship existed between perceived effectiveness and challenges among learners (ρ = .352, p < .001), while no significant relationship was found among teachers (ρ = -.173, p = .591). Qualitative findings highlighted the importance of face-to-face demonstrations, teacher guidance, reviewable learning resources, learner independence, and hands-on practice in enhancing dressmaking competencies. Based on the findings, an instructional enhancement plan was proposed to strengthen the implementation of blended instruction in TLE Dressmaking.

References

Arban, J. C., Enad, F. B., & Pabalan, A. P. (2024). The senior high school technical-vocational-livelihood track: Implementation and challenges. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13875831 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4975284

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 basic education curriculum: Junior high school Technology and Livelihood Education and senior high school Technical-Vocational-Livelihood track—Home Economics: Dressmaking (NC II).

Department of Education. (2020). Adoption of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan for School Year 2020–2021 in light of the COVID-19 public health emergency (DepEd Order No. 012, s. 2020).

Department of Education. (2022). Guidelines on the progressive expansion of face-to-face classes (DepEd Order No. 044, s. 2022).

Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG K to 10 curriculum of the K to 12 program: Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP)/Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE), Grades 4–10. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/MATATAG-EPP_TLE-CG-2023-Grades-4-10-1.pdf

Department of Education. (2024a). Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum (DepEd Order No. 010, s. 2024). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2024/07/23/july-23-2024-do-010-s-2024-policy-guidelines-on-the-implementation-of-the-matatag-curriculum/

Department of Education. (2024b). Amendment to DepEd Order No. 010, s. 2024 (Policy Guidelines on the Implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum) (DepEd Order No. 012, s. 2024). https://naro.law.upd.edu.ph/issuances/5810

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2015). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools. Jossey-Bass.

Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023a). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023b). Country digital education ecosystems and governance: A companion to Digital Education Outlook 2023. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/906134d4-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/906134d4-en

Prestoza, M. J. (2024). Assessing remote learning’s feasibility: A comprehensive analysis of Philippine public-school teachers’ use of learning management systems and blended learning approaches. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 14(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol14.1.3.2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol14.1.3.2024

Republic of the Philippines. (1987). The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines (Art. XIV). Official Gazette. https://officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/1987-constitution/

Republic of the Philippines. (2013). Republic Act No. 10533: Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. Official Gazette. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/

Song, S., & Lai, Y. C. (2025). Blended learning in vocational education: Benefits, challenges, and student engagement. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2548348. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2548348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2548348

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Technical Education and Skills Development Authority. (n.d.). Training regulations: Dressmaking NC II.

UNESCO & International Task Force on Teachers for Education 2030. (2024). Global report on teachers: Addressing teacher shortages and transforming the profession. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/global-report-teachers-addressing-teacher-shortages-and-transforming-profession

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms?. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/publication/technology

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-08

How to Cite

Alcala, J. M. D. (2026). Blended Instruction in Technology Livelihood Education: Implementation, Effectiveness, and Challenges Encountered by Grade 10 Dressmaking Students. International Journal of Global Goals and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.40