Challenges and Opportunities Encountered by the Teachers in the Implementation of Science Investigatory Projects

Authors

  • Maria Lyn G. Buntag Master of Arts in Education - Major in Educational Management, Bohol Island State University - Main Campus, Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.41

Keywords:

Elementary Science Education, Inquiry-Based Learning, Institutional Support, Mixed-Methods Research, Professional Development, Science Investigatory Projects, Sustainable Education

Abstract

This study examined the challenges and opportunities experienced by Grade 6 public elementary school teachers in implementing Science Investigatory Projects (SIPs) in five municipalities of Bohol, Philippines, to inform an evidence-based action plan. Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, the study surveyed 50 teachers selected through stratified random sampling and obtained qualitative accounts from 11 purposively selected teachers. A validated, researcher-modified questionnaire and open-ended questions provided data analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics, multiple regression, and thematic analysis. Teachers reported substantial implementation challenges (overall mean = 3.84), particularly limited resources and laboratory equipment (mean = 4.05), but perceived high opportunities (overall mean = 4.16), led by professional growth (mean = 4.26). Challenge ratings differed significantly by gender (p = .028) and educational attainment (p = .003), whereas opportunity ratings did not differ significantly across demographic groups. Overall, demographic variables did not significantly predict challenges or opportunities. Qualitative accounts reinforced resource and technical constraints while emphasizing contextualized investigations and practical use of local materials. These findings indicate that teachers recognize the educational value of SIPs despite persistent institutional and instructional barriers. Schools should prioritize laboratory resources, research-focused teacher development, dedicated mentoring time, and community partnerships. As findings reflect self-reported experiences from a limited geographic sample, broader investigation is warranted. The study offers localized evidence for strengthening sustainable inquiry-based education, advancing Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 and supporting innovation and partnerships consistent with SDGs 9 and 17.

References

Akuma, F. V., & Koenen, J. (2025). Inquiry-based science education: Tools for supporting the design of schoolteacher professional development programs. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), Article em2605. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16070

Banzuelo, J.-A. R., & Quiñones, J. R. B. (2026). Contextualization and localization in science curriculum implementation: A systematic review of strategies, impacts, and challenges in the Philippine basic education system. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 7(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.01.08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.01.08

Belisario, J. M., & Paglinawan, J. L. (2025). The relationship between instructional materials availability and student engagement in science. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 10(5), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100500025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100500025

Canipe, M. M. (2025). Putting the pieces back together: Challenges recomposing elementary science teaching. Science Education, 109(5), 1195–1212. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21955

Chen, F., & Chen, G. (2025). Technology-enhanced collaborative inquiry in K–12 classrooms: A systematic review of empirical studies. Science & Education, 34, 1731–1773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00538-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00538-8

Department of Education. (2025). National Science and Technology Fair for School Year 2024–2025 (DepEd Memorandum No. 016, s. 2025). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DM_s2025_016.pdf

Menon, D., Wieselmann, J. R., Haines, S., & Asim, S. (2024). A meta-synthesis of the literature on science & engineering teaching self-efficacy: Current gaps and future research directions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 35(5), 480–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2023.2297499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2023.2297499

Mohammed, S. M., & Luguterah, A. W. (2024). Exploration of science teaching self-efficacy outside professional development context for inquiry-based teaching. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2377840. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2377840 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2377840

Muhamad Dah, N., Mat Noor, M. S. A., Kamarudin, M. Z., & Syed Abdul Azziz, S. S. (2024). The impacts of open inquiry on students’ learning in science: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 43, Article 100601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100601

Pathoni, H., Asyhar, R., Maison, M., & Huda, N. (2022). Measuring lecturer’s perception in STEM approach based contextual learning implementation. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(1), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1297

Petersen, M. R. (2022). Strategies to scaffold students’ inquiry learning in science. Science Education International, 33(3), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i3.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i3.1

Polinar, M. A. N., Lara, F., Dagasdas, M. J., & Lizhen, L. (2025). Research capability and readiness in Philippine public schools: A systematic review of enablers and barriers. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 10(8), 1598–1607. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100800139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100800139

Preminger, L., Hayes, K. N., Bae, C. L., & O’Connor, D. (2024). Why do teachers vary in their instructional change during science PD? The role of noticing students in an iterative change process. Science Education, 108(3), 701–733. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21853

Sager, M. T., Pierce, K., & Murillo, J. (2025). Enhancing inquiry-based science instruction: The role of professional learning communities and instructional coaching for elementary science teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(5), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v14n5p26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v14n5p26

Setiyani, A., Munfaridah, N., & Hidayat, A. (2025). Challenges of science teachers in designing inquiry learning: A systematic literature review. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal, 8(2), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v8i2.1026

Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2024). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 60(2), 191–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148

Suwono, H., Maulidia, L., Saefi, M., Kusairi, S., & Yuenyong, C. (2022). The development and validation of an instrument of prospective science teachers’ perceptions of scientific literacy. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), Article em2068. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11505

Toma, R. B., Yánez-Pérez, I., & Meneses-Villagrá, J. Á. (2025). Measuring self-efficacy beliefs in teaching inquiry-based science and the nature of scientific inquiry. Science & Education, 34, 3347–3363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00553-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00553-9

UNESCO. (2024). Transforming education towards SDG4: Report of a global survey on country actions to transform education. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/transforming-education-towards-sdg4-report-global-survey-country-actions-transform-education

Wilson, M. M., Zafar, F., & Nichol, C. (2025). Fostering inquiry: The impact of cross-curricular professional development on STEM teacher practices. Education Sciences, 15(4), Article 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040421

Yahya, N., Fadzil, H. M., & Abdullah, M. N. S. (2026). Scientist-school STEM partnerships in K–12 education: A comprehensive systematic review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 23(2), 288–317. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2026.014

Yun, M., & Crippen, K. J. (2024). The use of educational technology in inquiry-based elementary science education: A systematic review. International Journal of Science Education, 46(12), 1256–1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2284689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2284689

Downloads

Published

2026-11-09

How to Cite

Buntag, M. L. G. (2026). Challenges and Opportunities Encountered by the Teachers in the Implementation of Science Investigatory Projects. International Journal of Global Goals and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 457-470. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.41