The Development and Assessment of Instructional Leadership Towards the Fidelity of SOLO Taxonomy

Authors

  • Daren Gonzales-Melecio, PhD Doctor of Education in Educational Management & Development, Cebu Technological University - Main Campus, Cebu City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.42

Keywords:

Educational Leadership, Implementation Context, Implementation Fidelity, Instructional Leadership, Instructional Resources, Junior High School, SOLO Taxonomy

Abstract

This study assessed instructional leadership practices, fidelity of Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) Taxonomy implementation, and implementation context among junior high school teachers in Trinidad Districts I and II, Bohol, to inform an instructional leadership framework. A quantitative descriptive-correlational design with comparative and predictive components involved 99 respondents (93 teachers, four school heads, and two public schools district supervisors) selected through complete enumeration. Data were obtained using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale and two validated researcher-developed questionnaires and analyzed through descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, regression, and Welch's ANOVA. Instructional leadership was rated high by teachers (M = 4.19), while SOLO implementation fidelity was very high (M = 4.21); the implementation context was moderately supportive (M = 2.97). Fidelity was positively associated with instructional leadership (r = .305, p = .003) and availability of instructional materials (r = .558, p < .001). Instructional materials independently predicted fidelity (β = .472, p < .001), and no significant stakeholder differences in leadership ratings emerged. Findings indicate that leadership and accessible instructional resources are associated with more consistent SOLO application, although the design does not establish causality. Schools should prioritize SOLO-aligned resources, instructional coaching, and stronger feedback and reflection practices. The four-school, questionnaire-based design limits generalizability and direct verification of instructional practices. The proposed leadership framework may guide evidence-informed school improvement and advance SDG 4 (Quality Education) through more sustainable instructional support.

References

Adeniji, S. M., Baker, P., & Schmude, M. (2022). Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) model: A mixed-method systematic review of research in mathematics education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6), Article em2119. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12087

Alanoglu, M. (2022). The role of instructional leadership in increasing teacher self-efficacy: A meta-analytic review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09726-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09726-5

Atrero, M. J. E., & Ravana, L. L. (2026). Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy and learner achievement: Impact on educational performance. The Advanced Social Science in Research Journal, 1(2), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.11594/assrj.01.02.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/assrj.01.02.12

Brooks, J. S., & Brooks, M. C. (2024). Hot leadership, cool leadership: How education policies are implemented (and ignored) in schools. Educational Policy, 38(7), 1608–1637. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048241268309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048241268309

Clavacio, R.-A., & Legaspi-Estoque, M. (2025). Application of SOLO taxonomy in teaching English. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 43(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.430103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.430103

DelaCerna, K. (2026). Elementary teachers' readiness in implementing Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) taxonomy in the classroom: Action plan. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 53(6), 664–680. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.530605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.530605

Department of Education. (2024, April 27). DepEd's MATATAG Agenda, BEDP 2030 approved by NEDA Board as national policy and plan for basic education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2024/04/27/depeds-matatag-agenda-bedp-2030-approved-by-neda-board-as-national-policy-and-plan-for-basic-education/

Dorukbaşi, E., & Cansoy, R. (2024). Examining the mediating role of teacher professional learning between perceived instructional leadership and teacher instructional practices. European Journal of Education, 59(3), Article e12672. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12672

Glover, T. A., Reddy, L. A., & Crouse, K. (2023). Instructional coaching actions that predict teacher classroom practices and student achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 96, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.10.006

Hallinger, P., Liu, S., & Chen, L. (2025). Principal instructional leadership and teacher attitudes: A meta-analytic review, 1989–2024. European Journal of Education, 60(4), Article e70199. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70199

He, P., Guo, F., & Abazie, G. A. (2024). School principals' instructional leadership as a predictor of teacher's professional development. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9, Article 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00290-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00290-0

Lindvall, J., Kirsten, N., Ryve, A., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2025). A critical review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the effects of the professional development teachers typically receive. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 86, Article 101482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101482

Lowell, B. R., Fogelman, S. E., & McNeill, K. L. (2024). Organizational sensemaking during curriculum implementation: The dilemma of agency, role of collaboration, and importance of discipline-specific leadership. Science Education, 108(5), 1448–1473. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21885

Lucas, N. B. I., Abrogena, L. G., & Panilo, J. G. (2026). The application of SOLO taxonomy in secondary science education: A scoping review. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 5(5), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v5i5.8599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v5i5.8599

Lyon, A. R., Corbin, C. M., Brown, E. C., Ehrhart, M. G., Locke, J., Davis, C., Picozzi, E., Aarons, G. A., & Cook, C. R. (2022). Leading the charge in the education sector: Development and validation of the School Implementation Leadership Scale (SILS). Implementation Science, 17, Article 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01222-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01222-7

Ninković, S., & Knežević Florić, O. (2024). School leadership and teaching practice: A systematic review of studies of the indirect effects. Journal of Educational Administration, 62(4), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2023-0190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2023-0190

Spacciapoli, M., Viana, M., Saunders Wilder, O., Sullivan, J., McCallum, T., & Wilder-Smith, B. (2022). An equitable and scalable approach to track fidelity of implementation in partnership with teachers. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 1020204. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1020204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1020204

Sudaria, C. M., & Sanchez, J. M. P. (2024). SOLO-based formative assessments in teaching and learning earthquakes. Science Education International, 35(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v35.i4.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v35.i4.11

Svensäter, G., & Rohlin, M. (2023). Assessment model blending formative and summative assessments using the SOLO taxonomy. European Journal of Dental Education, 27(1), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12787

Ulla, T., & Poom-Valickis, K. (2023). Program support matters: A systematic review on teacher- and school-related contextual factors facilitating the implementation of social-emotional learning programs. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 965538. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.965538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.965538

UNESCO & International Task Force on Teachers for Education 2030. (2024). Global report on teachers: Addressing teacher shortages and transforming the profession. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789231006555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/9789231006555

van Dijk, W., Lane, H. B., & Gage, N. A. (2023). How do intervention studies measure the relation between implementation fidelity and students' reading outcomes? A systematic review. The Elementary School Journal, 124(1), 56–84. https://doi.org/10.1086/725672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/725672

Visscher, A. J., Dmoshinskaia, N., Pellegrini, M., & Rey-Naizaque, A. (2025). (When) do teacher professional development interventions improve student achievement? A meta-analysis of 128 high-quality studies. Educational Research Review, 49, Article 100742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100742

Downloads

Published

2026-11-09

How to Cite

Gonzales-Melecio, D. (2026). The Development and Assessment of Instructional Leadership Towards the Fidelity of SOLO Taxonomy. International Journal of Global Goals and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 471-481. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.42