Workplace Environment Conditions and Administrative Productivity Indicators in the DepEd Schools Division Office of Bislig City: A Quantitative Descriptive Comparative Survey Design as Basis for an Enhancement Program

Authors

  • Christianssen D. Trujillo Master of Arts in Education, Major in Administration and Supervision, Andres Soriano Colleges of Bislig, Inc., Bislig City, Surigao del Sur, Philippines Author
  • Anrey G. Antiquina, PhD School President, Andres Soriano Colleges of Bislig, Inc., Bislig City, Surigao del Sur, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.44

Keywords:

Administrative Productivity, Employee Training, Physical Comfort, Schools Division Office, Work Pressure, Workplace Environment

Abstract

This study assessed workplace environment conditions and administrative productivity indicators among personnel of the Office of the Schools Division Superintendent at the Department of Education Schools Division Office of Bislig City to inform a workplace enhancement program. Using a quantitative descriptive-comparative, cross-sectional survey and total enumeration, data from 36 consenting personnel were collected through researcher-developed workplace environment (30 items) and productivity (18 items) questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal–Wallis tests, and Holm-adjusted pairwise comparisons were applied. Respondents reported very high involvement (M = 4.93) and supervisor support (M = 4.90), alongside very high work pressure (M = 4.76); physical comfort was the lowest-rated dimension (M = 3.44), particularly workstation suitability (M = 2.69). Task performance (M = 4.74) and contextual performance (M = 4.71) were consistently favorable, while counterproductive work behavior was rarely reported (M = 1.08). Training exposure significantly differentiated nine workplace dimensions and both task performance (p = .007) and contextual performance (p = .001), without establishing causation. Overall, strong self-reported productivity coexisted with substantial workload demands and less favorable physical working conditions. The proposed program prioritizes ergonomic improvements, workload management, equitable training, and documentation quality. Findings are limited by a single-office sample, small subgroups, and self-reported cross-sectional data. By identifying actionable administrative priorities, the study supports employee well-being, decent work, quality education, and effective public institutions, contributing to institutional and educational sustainability in alignment with Sustainable Development Goals 3, 4, 8, and 16.

References

Asamani, L., Acquah-Coleman, R., Senayah, W. K., & Oppong, S. (2025). Interactive roles of resource availability, role clarity and employee motivation in enhancing organisational effectiveness through employee performance and job satisfaction. Discover Psychology, 5, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-025-00333-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-025-00333-8

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933

Balancio-Canlas, A. M. T. (2026). The relationship of physical work environment on employee productivity of call center agents: Inputs to an enhanced productivity programs and strategies. Philippine Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 1(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.67730/6b501f65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.67730/6b501f65

Chaiyapruksayanonde, C., & Ponchaitiwat, K. (2025). Supportive work environments, innovative work behavior, and job performance in the hospitality industry: Empirical evidence from Thailand. Tourism and Hospitality, 6(1), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp6010020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp6010020

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us2.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-design/book270550

Department of Education. (2024). Immediate removal of administrative tasks of public school teachers (DepEd Order No. 002, s. 2024). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2024_002.pdf

Deutscher, V., & Braunstein, A. (2023). Measuring the quality of workplace learning environments—A qualitative meta synthesis of employee questionnaires. Journal of Workplace Learning, 35(9), 134–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-06-2022-0074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-06-2022-0074

El Achi, S., Jabbour Al Maalouf, N., Barakat, H., & Mawad, J. L. (2025). The impact of transformational leadership and work environment on teachers' performance in crisis-affected educational settings. Administrative Sciences, 15(7), Article 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15070256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15070256

Godfroid, C., Otiti, N., & Mersland, R. (2022). Employee tenure and staff performance: The case of a social enterprise. Journal of Business Research, 139, 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.011

Grantoza, S. A. (2025). Effects of leadership style, work environment, and organizational motivation on employee performance moderated by job satisfaction: A case of local government unit of San Pascual, Batangas. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(6), 6164–6192. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.906000474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.906000474

Guo, L., Jia, S., Niu, X., & Wang, Z. (2024). One who wishes to wear the crown, must bear its weight: How performance pressure benefits career-prospective employees in organizations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 155, Article 104056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104056

International Labour Organization, & World Health Organization. (2022). Mental health at work: Policy brief. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240057944

Kim, J., Chang, H., & Bell, B. S. (2026). Organizational-level training and performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Management, 52(5), 1772–1809. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063251327588 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063251327588

Kwon, S.-H., & Kim, J.-S. (2025). Relationship between participative decision-making within an organization and employees' cognitive flexibility, creativity, and voice behavior. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), Article 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010051

Lousã, E. P., Alves, M. P., & Koopmans, L. (2024). Adaptation and validation of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire into a Portuguese version. Administrative Sciences, 14(7), Article 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14070150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14070150

Madadizadeh, F., & Bahariniya, S. (2025). Tutorial on internal consistency assessment by Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management, 41, Article 100568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcorm.2025.100568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcorm.2025.100568

Milaad, S. A. M., Atan, T., & Yeşiltaş, M. (2025). Assessing the impact of perceived supervisory support on service recovery performance: The role of work engagement and emotional stability among Libyan air traffic controllers. Sustainability, 17(5), Article 2284. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052284

Nomura, K., & Ho, M. S. (2025). APO productivity databook 2025. Asian Productivity Organization. https://doi.org/10.61145/GENB1427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61145/GENB1427

Office of the U.S. Surgeon General. (2022). The U.S. Surgeon General's framework for workplace mental health & well-being. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/workplace-mental-health-well-being.pdf

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Government at a glance 2025. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0efd0bcd-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/0efd0bcd-en

Oyedeji, B. A., Ko, Y. H., & Lee, S. (2025). Physical work environments: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 51(6), 2589–2626. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063251315703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063251315703

Park, J., & Kim, J. (2024). The relationship between perceived organizational support, work engagement, organizational citizenship behavior, and customer orientation in the public sports organizations context. Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), Article 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030153

Second Congressional Commission on Education. (2025). Removing the burden of administration from teachers [Policy brief]. https://edcom2.gov.ph/media/2025/03/EDCOM2_Policy_Brief_Removing_the_Burden_of_Administration_from_Teachers.pdf

Skamagki, G., Greaves, C. J., Shrestha, R. M., & Stathi, A. (2026). Workplace interventions for chronic musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 16(6), Article e115276. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115276

Slater, P., & Hasson, F. (2025). Quantitative research designs, hierarchy of evidence and validity. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 32(3), 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.13135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.13135

Sørlie, H. O., Hetland, J., Bakker, A. B., Espevik, R., & Olsen, O. K. (2022). Daily autonomy and job performance: Does person–organization fit act as a key resource? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 133, Article 103691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103691

Tabasa, C. S., Polinar, M. A. N., Delantar, A. F. A., Delantar, A. B., & Ouano, C. L. (2025). Training and development in employee retention and organizational effectiveness at a manufacturing firm in Naga City, Cebu, Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(6), 2766–2777. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.06.09 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.06.09

Twombly, S. (2024). Assessment and evaluation in higher education: A practical guide. University of Kansas. https://opentext.ku.edu/assessmentevaluationhighered/

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2025). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2025. United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2025/

Valencia, A. P. O. (2025). The impact of workplace environment on employee productivity and employee health in the local government unit of Santa Rita, Pampanga. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(12), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.701

Villena, J. B., & Diamante, V. E. (2025). Work environment and employee productivity in selected higher education institutions of Manila. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 12(11), 844–858. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12110077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12110077

World Health Organization. (2022). WHO guidelines on mental health at work. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052

Yücel, İ., & Bayat, F. (2025). The mediating role of co-worker support in the relationship between occupational stress and employee performance: A study of airports. Ekonomski Vjesnik/Econviews – Review of Contemporary Business, Entrepreneurship and Economic Issues, 38(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.51680/ev.38.1.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51680/ev.38.1.5

Downloads

Published

2026-11-09

How to Cite

Trujillo, C. D., & Antiquina, A. G. (2026). Workplace Environment Conditions and Administrative Productivity Indicators in the DepEd Schools Division Office of Bislig City: A Quantitative Descriptive Comparative Survey Design as Basis for an Enhancement Program. International Journal of Global Goals and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 494-505. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.44