Character Formation and Philippine National Police (PNP) Creed: A Basis for Policy Program Intervention

Authors

  • Josephine Dacayana Matos, RCrim, JD Doctor of Philosophy in Criminal Justice Education with Specialization in Criminology, PHINMA-Cagayan de Oro College, Carmen, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.50

Keywords:

Character Formation, Ethical Policing, Institutional Accountability, Northern Mindanao, PNP Creed, Police Officers, Professional Ethics

Abstract

This study examined the perceived effectiveness of Philippine National Police (PNP) character formation programs and their association with adherence to the PNP Creed among patrolmen and patrolwomen in Region X, Northern Mindanao, to inform a policy intervention. A quantitative descriptive-correlational design involved 172 purposively selected officers surveyed using a validated researcher-developed questionnaire, supplemented by semi-structured interviews with 10 participants. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, regression analysis, and thematic analysis were employed. All four programs were rated highly effective (overall M = 3.54), with Squad Weekly Interactive Meeting receiving the highest rating (M = 3.55). Respondents reported high adherence to the creed across respect for authority, respect for women, sanctity of marriage, and stewardship of material resources. Perceived program effectiveness was strongly and positively associated with creed adherence (r = .774, p < .001); age and sex showed no significant moderating effects. Interviews emphasized continuous learning, moral reflection, and peer support. These results suggest that participatory and sustained character formation aligns with stronger self-reported ethical commitment. The study recommends piloting the proposed PNP Creed-Based Virtue, Ethics, and Integrity Lifecycle System, with ongoing evaluation. Purposive regional sampling, self-report measures, and the correlational design constrain generalizability and causal inference; some demographic moderation results require reconciliation. By informing lifelong police ethics training and accountability, the study supports institutional sustainability and advances SDG 16 (strong institutions), SDG 4 (quality education), and SDG 5 (gender equality).

References

Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5

Atari, M., Haidt, J., Graham, J., Koleva, S., Stevens, S. T., & Dehghani, M. (2023). Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(5), 1157–1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000470

Cabilan, W. M. C., Cuevas, J. F., Jr., Aligo, J. B., Aguilar, G. A. V., Camay, H. P., & Dianalan, N. D. (2023). Gearing towards gender equality: Insights from female police officers in their experiences at their workplaces. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(6), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7604

Caliwan, C. L. (2025, January 26). Nearly 3K erring police officers sanctioned in 2024. Philippine News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1242662

Choi, N., & Jang, J. (2024). The effect of organizational justice on police officers’ perception of procedural justice in the South Korea: The mediating roles of perceived discretion and responsiveness. Policing: An International Journal, 47(2), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-11-2023-0143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-11-2023-0143

Christoff, T., & Carleton, B. (2024). Buy-in for police early intervention systems: An initial exploration of what works. Journal of Criminal Justice, 92, Article 102179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102179

Corbo Crehan, A., Delaforce, R., & Shipton, B. (2025). A new focus for accountability: Enabling police to act well. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 37(4), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2025.2531316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2025.2531316

Corpuz, R. R. N. (2025). The effectiveness and challenges of Squad Weekly Interactive Meetings (SWIM) at a municipal police station. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.36713/epra21629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra21629

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Grace, P. J., Peter, E., Lachman, V. D., Johnson, N. L., Kenny, D. J., & Wocial, L. D. (2024). Professional responsibility, nurses, and conscientious objection: A framework for ethical evaluation. Nursing Ethics, 31(2–3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330231180749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330231180749

Harris, D., Borcan, O., Serra, D., Telli, H., Schettini, B., & Dercon, S. (2024). Proud to belong: The impact of ethics training on police officers in Ghana (CEPR Discussion Paper No. 19141). Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://cepr.org/publications/dp19141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4828415

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, Article 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Human Rights Watch. (2024, October 18). Philippines: Adopt police reforms, accountability measures. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/10/18/philippines-adopt-police-reforms-accountability-measures

Illias, M., Riach, K., & Demou, E. (2024). Understanding the interplay between organisational injustice and the health and wellbeing of female police officers: A meta-ethnography. BMC Public Health, 24, Article 2659. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20152-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20152-1

International Association of Chiefs of Police. (2024). Policing code of ethics. https://www.theiacp.org/resources/policing-code-of-ethics

Jordan, A., & Kim, T. (2025). Strengthening police oversight: The impacts of misconduct investigators on police officer behavior. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 44(4), 1286–1316. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.70002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.70002

Kleygrewe, L., Oudejans, R. R. D., Koedijk, M., & Hutter, R. I. V. (2022). Police training in practice: Organization and delivery according to European law enforcement agencies. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 798067. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.798067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.798067

Lin, K.-H., Sidebottom, A., & Wortley, R. (2024). Police education and democratic policing in Taiwan: A longitudinal quasi-experimental study of the effects of selection and police socialisation on human rights, moral reasoning and prejudice. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 20, 787–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09560-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09560-2

Luczon, N. (2025, January 28). N. Mindanao cops review disciplinary mechanisms. Philippine News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1242827

Maile, A., Thompson, A., McLoughlin, S., & Kristjánsson, K. (2023). The choice of deontological, virtue ethical, and consequentialist moral reasoning strategies by pre- and in-service police officers in the U.K.: An empirical study. Ethics & Behavior, 33(8), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2022.2124995 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2022.2124995

Miles-Johnson, T. (2022). Religious policing: How religion and level of religiosity shape officer’s interaction with minority groups. SN Social Sciences, 2, Article 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00374-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00374-z

Miles-Johnson, T. (2024). Discretionary policing: Following religious beliefs or operational guidelines, decision-making, and citizen engagement. SN Social Sciences, 4, Article 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-024-00859-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-024-00859-z

Montolo, M. V., & Sabijon, D. F. (2025). Internalizing the moral recovery practices of the Philippine National Police (PNP): Perspectives of police officers in the Quad Cities of Cebu. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 7(6), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2025.7.6.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2025.7.6.2

Philippine National Police. (2024). Revised primer on personnel decorum. Directorate for Human Resource and Doctrine Development. https://sites.google.com/view/camppopro10/pnp-manuals

Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., Williams, L. J., Huang, C., & Yang, J. (2024). Common method bias: It’s bad, it’s complex, it’s widespread, and it’s not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11, 17–61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030

Taniguchi, T., Vovak, H., Cordner, G., Amendola, K., Yang, Y., Hoogesteyn, K., & Bartness, M. (2022). The impact of active bystander training on officer confidence and ability to address ethical challenges. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 16(3), 508–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paac034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paac034

United Nations. (2025). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2025. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2025/

Zakaria, N. Z., Osman, I., & Noranee, S. (2023). The influence of personality traits on ethical behavior of police: The mediating effect of ethical leadership. Information Management and Business Review, 15(4[SI]I), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v15i4(SI)I.3585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v15i4(SI)I.3585

Downloads

Published

2026-11-11

How to Cite

Matos, J. D. (2026). Character Formation and Philippine National Police (PNP) Creed: A Basis for Policy Program Intervention. International Journal of Global Goals and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 569-583. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijggsd.V1.I1.50