Initial Assessment of the Marinduque State University on the Implementation of an Educational Organization Management System (EOMS) Certifiable to ISO 21001:2018

Authors

  • Raoul J. Magcamit Associate Professor and Director, University Quality Assurance Division, Marinduque State University, Marinduque, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/wjsam.V1.I2.7

Keywords:

Educational Organization Management System (EOMS), Gap Analysis, ISO 21001:2018, Marinduque State University, Quality Assurance, Readiness Assessment, State Universities and Colleges

Abstract

This study assessed the readiness of Marinduque State University (MarSU) to implement an Educational Organization Management System (EOMS) certifiable to ISO 21001:2018 by evaluating institutional conformity, identifying implementation gaps, and determining certification readiness. A descriptive-evaluative research design was employed, involving key institutional stakeholders selected through purposive sampling. Data were gathered using a researcher-developed ISO 21001:2018 assessment checklist and gap analysis matrix, supported by document analysis and semi-structured key informant interviews. Gap analysis was conducted to evaluate conformity with the standard and identify priority areas for improvement. Findings revealed that MarSU conformed to 19 of the 28 assessed clauses and sub-clauses, representing an overall conformity rate of 67.86%, while 32.14% were identified as nonconforming. Major strengths were observed in organizational context, leadership commitment, planning, performance evaluation, and continual improvement. However, deficiencies remained in Quality Policy approval, designated quality management responsibilities, resource provision, infrastructure, personnel competence, operational controls, and stakeholder satisfaction monitoring. The study concluded that MarSU possesses a functional EOMS and falls within the study's certifiable category, subject to addressing identified nonconformities. It recommends strengthening institutional documentation, resource management, stakeholder engagement, and continuous monitoring. As an institution-specific assessment, the findings have limited generalizability beyond MarSU. The study provides evidence-based guidance for institutional quality improvement and certification preparation, supporting Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education) and Sustainable Development Goal 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) through sustainable educational governance and accountability.

Views: 0Downloads: 0

References

Abu Bakar, M., Ismail, S., & Darwi, L. M. (2024). ISO 21001:2018 in academia: A review of literature. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Practices, 7(26), 68–82.

Bilal et al. (2024–2025). ISO 21001:2018 in academia: A review of literature. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Practice, 7(26), 68–82. https://gaexcellence.com/ijemp/article/download/1612/1284/4877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEMP.726006

Caco, Bakri, HaMarSU Abdul Gani, & Rifdan. (2024). Implementation strategy of ISO 21001:2018-based service quality management standards at SMK Telkom Makassar, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i21268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i21268

ERIC. (2020). Internal quality assurance in higher education: The 3P model.

International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. (2026). Strategic quality assurance frameworks aligned with ISO 21001:2018. https://journal.as-salafiyah.id/index.php/ijir/article/download/328/133

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 21001:2018: Educational organizations—Management systems for educational organizations—Requirements. https://www.iso.org

Raya, M. Y., Hidayat, T., Yuspiani, & Basri, A. D. (2022). The existence of the implementation of a higher education management system based on SNI ISO 21001:2018. Idaarah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 6(2), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.24252/idaarah.v6i2.31648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/idaarah.v6i2.31648

RePEc. (2024). Clusters in quality assurance research. Education and Workforce Studies, 8(6), 6579–6588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.3410

RePEc. (2026). Leadership and communication in ISO 21001 implementation. Business and Economic Research, 10(5), 3443–3480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500236

ResearchGate. (2020). Developing an evidence-based evaluation tool for continuous improvement program of the Department of Education.

ScienceDirect. (2024). Quality management systems in higher education: Governance and academic practices.

SIS Certifications. (2024). ISO 21001 non-conformity: What no one is talking about. https://www.siscertifications.com/non-conformities-in-iso-21001/

Syahrullah, Y., Yanti, A., Adhiana, T. P., & Imran, R. A. (2022). GAP analysis of higher education quality assurance system implementation against educational organization management standards ISO 21001:2018. OE, 14(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.22441/oe.2022.v14.i1.044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22441/oe.2022.v14.i1.044

UNESCO. (2024). Quality assurance in higher education.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-09

How to Cite

Magcamit, R. J. (2026). Initial Assessment of the Marinduque State University on the Implementation of an Educational Organization Management System (EOMS) Certifiable to ISO 21001:2018. World Journal of Sustainable Advances in Multidisciplinarity, 1(2), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.65339/wjsam.V1.I2.7

Similar Articles

1-10 of 17

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.