Digital Pathways to Literacy: E-Reading Interventions for Junior High School Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsis.V1.I2.119Keywords:
Digital Literacy, E-Reading, Junior High, Reading Comprehension, Speech Recognition, Struggling Readers, Voice AssistanceAbstract
This study developed and evaluated Digital Pathways to Literacy: E-Reading Interventions for Junior High School Learners, a voice-assisted mobile application designed to support struggling readers through interactive reading activities, text-to-speech, speech recognition, real-time feedback, assessment, and progress tracking. The study was anchored in socio-constructivism, cognitive theory of multimedia learning, self-determination theory, and the technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. A pre-experimental pretest-posttest design and developmental research approach within a research-and-development framework were employed. Respondents comprised 30 Grade 7 struggling readers, 11 English teachers, and one Public School District Supervisor selected through purposive sampling. A researcher-made, expert-validated questionnaire assessed usability and acceptability, while an assessment adapted from the Philippine Informal Reading Inventory measured reading comprehension before and after the four-week intervention. Students and educators rated the application as highly usable, with weighted means of 3.93 and 3.96, respectively, and highly acceptable, with weighted means of 3.92 and 3.83. Learners also demonstrated improved reading comprehension from pre-test to post-test, although difficulties with longer sentences were initially observed. The study concluded that the application is a usable, acceptable, and effective supplementary tool for supporting junior high school reading comprehension. Further development, classroom integration, institutional support, larger samples, and longer intervention periods were recommended. The study supports SDG 4 (Quality Education), SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure), and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) by applying accessible digital technology to literacy support for struggling learners. Its sustainability impact lies in supporting continued literacy development, independent reading practice, accessible learning support, and technology-assisted literacy intervention within public secondary education.
References
Al-Maroof, R. S., & Salloum, S. A. (2021). An integrated model of continuous intention to use of Google Classroom. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10435-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47411-9_18
Al-Nuaimi, M. N., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). Learning management systems and technology acceptance models: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 5499–5533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10513-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10513-3
Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909
Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(S1), S14–S30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998
Dahl-Leonard, K., Hall, C., & Peacott, D. (2024). A meta-analysis of technology-delivered literacy instruction for elementary students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 1507–1538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10354-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10354-0
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Díaz Calle, Z., Noria Aliaga, V. M., & Buendía Molina, M. A. (2024). Comprensión lectora en la era digital: Una revisión sistemática. Revista Andina de Educación, 7(2), 000721. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312816.2024.7.2.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32719/26312816.2024.7.2.1
Filderman, M. J., Austin, C. R., Boucher, A. N., O’Donnell, K., & Swanson, E. A. (2022). A meta-analysis of the effects of reading comprehension interventions on the reading comprehension outcomes of struggling readers in third through 12th grades. Exceptional Children, 88(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029211050860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029211050860
Furenes, M. I., Kucirkova, N., & Bus, A. G. (2021). A comparison of children’s reading on paper versus screen: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91(4), 483–517. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321998074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321998074
Google Cloud. (n.d.). Speech-to-Text documentation. https://cloud.google.com/speech-to-text/docs
Granić, A. (2022). Educational technology adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 9725–9744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7
Gupta, S., Abbas, A. F., & Srivastava, R. (2022). Technology acceptance model (TAM): A bibliometric analysis from inception. Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy, 10(3), 77–106. https://doi.org/10.18080/jtde.v10n3.598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18080/jtde.v10n3.598
Hall, C., Dahl-Leonard, K., Cho, E., Solari, E. J., Capin, P., Conner, C. L., Henry, A. R., Cook, L., Hayes, L., Vargas, I., Richmond, C. L., & Kehoe, K. F. (2023). Forty years of reading intervention research for elementary students with or at risk for dyslexia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(2), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.477 International Literacy Association (ILA) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.477
Hare, C., Tekok-Kilic, A., & Curtin, S. (2024). Children’s reading outcomes in digital and print mediums: A systematic review. Journal of Research in Reading, 47(3), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12461
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel: A synthesis of over 2,100 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003380542
Irwanto. (2021). Research trends in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic literature review from 2010 to 2021. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 2045–2054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.2045
Jiménez Sierra, Á. A., Ortega Iglesias, J. M., Cabero-Almenara, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2023). Development of the teacher’s technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) from the Lesson Study: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1078913. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1078913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1078913
Learned, J. E., Frankel, K. K., & Brooks, M. D. (2022). Disrupting secondary reading intervention: A review of qualitative research and a call to action. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 65(6), 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1234
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
Murphy, A., & Arciuli, J. (2024). Digital reading comprehension instruction in English for children with English as an additional language: A systematic review. Journal of Research in Reading, 47(3), 348–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12448
Nkomo, L. M., Daniel, B. K., & Butson, R. J. (2021). Synthesis of student engagement with digital technologies: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00270-1
OECD. (2021). OECD digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Ali, A. M., & Abu Bakar, S. (2022). Self-determination theory and online learning in university: Advancements, future direction and research gaps. Sustainability, 14(21), 14655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114655 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114655
Salmerón, L., Vargas, C., Delgado, P., & Baron, N. (2023). Relation between digital tool practices in the language arts classroom and reading comprehension scores. Reading and Writing, 36, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10295-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10295-1
Schmid, M., Brianza, E., Mok, S. Y., & Petko, D. (2024). Running in circles: A systematic review of reviews on technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 214, 105024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105024
Sohn, H., Acosta, K., Brownell, M. T., Gage, N. A., Tompson, E., & Pudvah, C. (2023). A meta-analysis of interventions to improve reading comprehension outcomes for adolescents with reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 38(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12307
Vanbecelaere, S., Reynvoet, B., & Depaepe, F. (2023). The effectiveness of Tier 1 digital interventions for early reading: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1397–1432. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13351
Verhoeven, L., Voeten, M., & Segers, E. (2022). Computer-assisted word reading intervention effects throughout the primary grades: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 37, 100486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100486
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Whitney, T., & Ackerman, K. B. (2023). Effects of a digital fluency-based reading program for students with significant reading difficulties. Journal of Special Education Technology, 38(3), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434221093774 University of Kentucky DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434221093774
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
World Bank. (2022). The state of global learning poverty: 2022 update. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/publication/state-of-global-learning-poverty
Yeh, Y.-F., Chan, K. K. H., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2021). Toward a framework that connects individual TPACK and collective TPACK: A systematic review of TPACK studies investigating teacher collaborative discourse in the learning by design process. Computers & Education, 171, 104238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104238
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Edilyn S. Calamba (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. This license permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
