Instructional Supervision and Teachers’ Performance in a Public School: A Case Study

Authors

  • Mark A. Amador Master of Arts in Educational Management, School of Graduate Studies, Iloilo State University of Fisheries Science and Technology, Barotac Nuevo, Iloilo, Philippines Author
  • Romelo T. Velez Master of Arts in Educational Management, School of Graduate Studies, Iloilo State University of Fisheries Science and Technology, Barotac Nuevo, Iloilo, Philippines Author
  • Kenneth James P. Sazon Master of Arts in Educational Management, School of Graduate Studies, Iloilo State University of Fisheries Science and Technology, Barotac Nuevo, Iloilo, Philippines Author
  • Rhea D. Vilches Master of Arts in Educational Management, School of Graduate Studies, Iloilo State University of Fisheries Science and Technology, Barotac Nuevo, Iloilo, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsis.V1.I1.20

Keywords:

Classroom Management, Constructive Feedback, Instructional Supervision, Professional Development, Reflective Practice, Teacher Performance

Abstract

This study examined how instructional supervision is experienced by teachers and how it influences their teaching performance in a public elementary school in Barotac Nuevo, Iloilo, Philippines. Conceptually grounded in a developmental and relational view of instructional supervision, the study employed a qualitative case study design involving five purposively selected teachers assigned to Grades 1 to 3. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations using RPMS indicators, and document review of Classroom Observation Tool forms and lesson plans, and were analyzed through thematic analysis. Findings revealed that instructional supervision served as a developmental tool that strengthened instructional preparedness, classroom management, professional confidence, reflective practice, and responsiveness to learner needs. Constructive feedback, coaching, and post-observation discussions encouraged teachers to refine lesson planning, adopt differentiated and interactive strategies, and improve learner engagement. However, observation-related anxiety, heavy administrative workloads, limited time, and inconsistent or unclear feedback constrained the effectiveness of supervision. Teachers preferred collaborative, supportive, and growth-oriented supervision characterized by coaching, mentoring, peer interaction, and reflective dialogue. The study concludes that instructional supervision is most effective when implemented as a supportive, reflective, and developmental process rather than as a judgment-oriented requirement. It recommends strengthening coaching and mentoring cycles, reducing administrative workload, providing regular constructive feedback, and promoting peer supervision and Professional Learning Communities. The study aligns primarily with SDG 4 – Quality Education by supporting teacher professional development and sustained instructional quality. Its contribution to educational and institutional sustainability lies in strengthening continuous professional learning, supportive supervision, and school systems that promote sustained teaching effectiveness.

References

Alfonso, R. (2021). Instructional supervision practices in Philippine public schools. Philippine Journal of Education, 94(2), 45–58.

Andal, L. L. M. (2024). School-based instructional supervision process in focus: Challenges encountered. Bukal: The Official Research Journal of LCBA Master of Arts in Education, 1(1).

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Castillo, M. A. (2024). Impact of instructional supervision strategies on teacher performance in Hinabangan Samar District 1. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(9), 3602–3608. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.09.19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.09.19

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Department of Education. (2023). Multi-year guidelines on the Results-Based Performance Management System–Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (DepEd Memorandum No. 008, s. 2023).

Department of Education. (2024). Policy guidelines on the implementation of the Revised School-Based Management System (DepEd Order No. 007, s. 2024).

Department of Education. (2025). Interim guidelines for the performance management and evaluation system (PMES) for teachers in School Year 2024–2025 (DepEd Memorandum No. 017, s. 2025).

Glover, T. A., et al. (2023). Instructional coaching actions that predict teacher classroom practices and student achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 96, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.10.006

Godes, A. R., & Dioso, E. (2024). School head’s instructional supervisory practices and the performance of the teachers: A correlational study. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(7).

Mok, S. Y., Rupp, D., & Holzberger, D. (2023). What kind of individual support activities in interventions foster pre-service and beginning teachers’ self-efficacy? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 40, 100552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100552

Nugent, G., Houston, J., Kunz, G., & Chen, D. (2023). Analysis of instructional coaching: What, why and how. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 12(4), 402–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-08-2022-0066

Mayos, A. D. (2026). Instructional supervisors’ competence in providing coaching, mentoring, and feedback to teachers in Atok, Benguet, Philippines. [Research article].s DOI: https://doi.org/10.69739/jelm.v3i2.1925

Miller, et al. (2025). A systematic review and single-case meta-analysis of performance feedback as teacher professional development. Journal of School Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2025.100100

Downloads

Published

2026-08-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Amador, M. A., Velez, R. T., Sazon, K. J. P., & Vilches, R. D. (2026). Instructional Supervision and Teachers’ Performance in a Public School: A Case Study. International Journal of Sustainable and Integrated Studies, 1(1), 209-214. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsis.V1.I1.20

Similar Articles

31-40 of 102

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.