Implementation and Perceived Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Learning Strategies in Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsis.V1.I3.243Keywords:
Collaborative Learning, Conceptual Understanding, Inquiry-Based Learning, Instructional Effectiveness, Professional Development, Science Education, Scientific Inquiry Skills, Student Engagement, Teacher PerceptionsAbstract
This study examined the implementation and perceived effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) strategies in science among teachers and students in five public junior high schools in Panabo City, Davao del Norte. Anchored in Constructivist Learning Theory, Social Constructivism, Progressive Inquiry, and Cognitive Load Theory, it employed a quantitative descriptive-correlational design. Respondents comprised 31 Science teachers selected through total enumeration and 100 Grade 10 students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using validated researcher-developed questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and independent samples t-tests. Teachers rated IBL implementation as Highly Implemented (M = 4.66) and its effectiveness as Highly Effective (M = 4.71), whereas students rated implementation as Implemented (M = 4.17) and effectiveness as Effective (M = 4.09). Significant positive relationships emerged between implementation and perceived effectiveness, with stronger associations in students’ assessments. Significant differences between teacher and student ratings indicated disparities in their classroom perceptions. The findings concerned student engagement, conceptual understanding, scientific inquiry skills, collaborative learning, and problem-solving abilities. The study proposed the INQUIRE+ Professional Development Program to strengthen Science teachers’ inquiry-based instruction through coaching, collaborative lesson study, reflective practice, and systematic monitoring and evaluation. It aligns with Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education) by supporting improved Science instruction and continuing teacher development. Its contribution to educational and institutional sustainability lies in promoting sustained professional learning, school-based collaboration, and evidence-informed instructional improvement across participating schools and varied local classroom learning contexts. Further evaluation of the proposed program is needed to establish its effectiveness after implementation.
References
Aguila, R. E. (2023). Development and validation of inquiry-based learning activity sheets in Physical Science. UIJRT Journal, 4(7), 1–14.
Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2024). Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students' higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 251–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216
Aregehagn, E. (2022). The transformative effects of guided inquiry-based learning on students' conceptions: Evidence from Ethiopian classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 44(9), 1420–1440.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Open Court.
Bernardo, A. B. I., Ganotice, F. A., & King, R. B. (2023). Profiling low-proficiency science students in the Philippines: Insights from large-scale assessment. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01705-y
Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2022). Teacher-directed learning approaches and science achievement: Investigating the importance of instructional explanations in Australian schools. Research in Science Education, 52(4), 1171–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10002-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10002-0
Couso Lagaron, D. M., Grimalt Alvaro, M. D. C., López Simó, V., Marbà Tallada, A., & Oliveras Prat, B. (2024). Desarrollar la competencia científica. GRAÓ 12-18: Tu espacio de referencia en Educación Secundaria, (1), 58–64.
de Jong, T. (2023). The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction. Studies in Science Education, 59(2), 151–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2204999
de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Chinn, C. A., Fischer, F., Gobert, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Koedinger, K. R., Krajcik, J. S., Kyza, E. A., Linn, M. C., Pedaste, M., Scheiter, K., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2024). Beyond inquiry or direct instruction: Pressing issues for designing impactful science learning opportunities. Educational Research Review, 44, Article 100623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100623
Gillies, R. M. (2023). Using cooperative learning to enhance students' learning and engagement during inquiry-based science. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1242. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121242
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel: A synthesis of over 2,100 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003380542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003380542
Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Morales-Menendez, R., Escobar Díaz, C., & Arinez, J. (2022). Active learning in engineering education: A review of collaborative and student-centered approaches. Education Sciences, 12(4), 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040199
Mediana, N. L., Jr., Funa, A. A., & Dio, R. V. (2025). Effectiveness of inquiry-based learning on improving students' conceptual understanding in science and mathematics: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 13(2), 532–552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4769
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022). Science and engineering in preschool through elementary grades: The brilliance of children and the strengths of educators. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/26215
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en
Ormanci, U. (2025). The effect of web-assisted guided inquiry approach on students' systems thinking skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-025-10238-9
Owolade, A. O., Salami, O., Kareem, O., & Oladipupo, A. (2022). Effectiveness of guided inquiry and open inquiry instructional strategies in improving biology students' achievement. Anatolian Journal of Education, 7(2), Article 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2022.723a
Petersen, M. R. (2022). Strategies to scaffold students' inquiry learning in science. Science Education International, 33(3), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i3.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i3.1
Philippine Health Research Ethics Board. (2022). National ethical guidelines for research involving human participants. Philippine Council for Health Research and Development. https://www.pchrd.dost.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/2022-NEGRIHP_Official-Gazatte_Ver-5-1.pdf
Republic Act No. 10173, Data Privacy Act of 2012 (2012). https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2012/ra_10173_2012.html
Sam, R. (2024). Systematic review of inquiry-based learning: Impact and best practices. F1000Research, 13, Article 1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155367.1
Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2024). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 60(2), 191–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148
Sweller, J. (2022). Cognitive load theory. In International encyclopedia of education (4th ed., pp. 127–134). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.14020-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.14020-5
Sulistyani, K. (2022). The effectiveness of guided inquiry implementation to improve students' science process skills: A literature analysis. Journal of Science Education Studies, 5(3), 45–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i6.258
Talavera-Mendoza, F., Ramirez, J. A., & Cruz, L. P. (2024). Teacher performance level in guiding inquiry-based learning in secondary science classrooms. Education and Learning Research Journal, 14(8), 805–821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080805
UNESCO, & International Task Force on Teachers for Education 2030. (2024). Global report on teachers: Addressing teacher shortages and transforming the profession. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000388832
Urdanivia Alarcon, D. A., Talavera-Mendoza, F., Rucano Paucar, F. H., Cayani Caceres, K. S., & Machaca Viza, R. (2023). Science and inquiry-based teaching and learning: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1170487. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1170487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1170487
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, H. H., Hong, Z. R., Liu, S. C., & Lin, H. S. (2022). The role of structured, guided, and open inquiry in science and mathematics education: A literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), Article 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00329-z
Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Chen, J. (2023). Fostering higher-order thinking through inquiry-based learning in science education: A systematic review. International Journal of Science Education, 45(12), 1025–1043.
Zhu, L., & Atompag, S. M. (2023). The application of the constructivism theory in enhancing classroom teaching. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(12), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v7i12.5792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v7i12.5792
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shaira May M. Goriona (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. This license permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
