Perceptions of Tourists on the Tourism Sites in Siargao Island
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsis.V1.I4.286Keywords:
Destination Management, Environmental Sustainability, Service Quality, Siargao Island, Sustainable Tourism, Tourist Perceptions, Tourism AccessibilityAbstract
This study assessed tourists’ perceptions of tourism sites in Siargao Island, Surigao del Norte, Philippines, focusing on tourist attractions, facilities and amenities, accessibility, environmental condition, and service quality, and examined differences across demographic characteristics. A descriptive quantitative design was employed involving 200 domestic and international tourists selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed through descriptive statistics, Kruskal–Wallis tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and pairwise comparisons. Findings revealed favorable perceptions, with service quality receiving the highest rating (M = 3.63), followed by environmental condition (M = 3.54) and tourist attractions (M = 3.53). Facilities and amenities (M = 3.38) and accessibility (M = 3.37) received comparatively lower ratings. Significant differences existed among the five perception factors (p < .001). Age significantly differentiated four perception dimensions, while travel frequency differentiated perceptions of attractions; sex, civil status, and nationality showed no significant differences. The study concluded that Siargao’s tourism strengths centered on service quality, environmental conditions, and attractions, while infrastructure-related improvements remained necessary. Tourism stakeholders should prioritize accessibility, visitor facilities, environmental protection, and consistent service standards. Findings were limited by purposive sampling, selected tourism sites, and the March–April 2026 collection period. The study provides evidence for destination management aligned with Sustainable Development Goals 8, 11, and 12, supporting responsible tourism, community development, and environmental sustainability.
References
Agapito, D., Oom do Valle, P., & Mendes, J. (2013). The cognitive-affective-conative model of destination image: A confirmatory analysis. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(5), 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2013.803393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2013.803393
Agyeiwaah, E., Oum, S., & Adongo, F. (2022). Sustainable infrastructure and tourist satisfaction in developing economies. Journal of Tourism and Sustainability.
Alrawadieh, Z., Prayag, G., & Alrawadieh, A. (2021). Service quality and tourist loyalty: The mediating role of satisfaction. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102828
Buca, R. S. (2024a). Ecotourism destination branding analysis of Siargao Island, Surigao del Norte, Philippines. European Journal of Management, Economics and Business, 1(3), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejmeb.2024.1(3).03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59324/ejmeb.2024.1(3).03
Buca, R. S. (2024b). Price image of Siargao and comparison of perceptions between tourists and non-visitors of Siargao, Philippines. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i10-42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i10-42
Bui, H. T., Le, T. T., & Nguyen, T. T. (2023). Environmental degradation and destination image: Evidence from island tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(4), 987–1004. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2022.2092345
Cahigas, M. M. L., Ong, A. K. S., & Prasetyo, Y. T. (2023). Super Typhoon Rai’s impacts on Siargao tourism: Deciphering tourists’ revisit intentions through machine-learning algorithms. Sustainability, 15(11), 8463. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118463 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118463
Dagohoy, R., Mendoza, J., & Alvarez, K. (2023). Hotel attributes, guest experiences, and satisfaction among DOT-accredited Mabuhay accommodation establishments: A case in the Caraga Region. Consortia Academia Publishing. https://consortiacademia.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/v13i16/24836_final.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2024.24836
Dela Cruz, M., & Santos, L. (2025). Destination benchmarking and competitiveness in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Tourism Research.
Department of Tourism. (2024). National tourism development report. DOT Publications. https://www.dotr.gov.ph
Descarten, R. (2023). Tourism 5A, tourism satisfaction, and electronic word of mouth in a small island destination. Journal of Business on Hospitality and Tourism, 9(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.22334/jbhost.v9i1.425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22334/jbhost.v9i1.425
Echtner, C. M., & Ritchie, J. R. B. (1991). The meaning and measurement of destination image. Journal of Tourism Studies, 2(2), 2–12.
Gretzel, U. (2023). Digital transformation in tourism: The role of social media in destination image formation. Journal of Travel Research, 62(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211062590
Gunn, C. A. (1972). Vacationscape: Designing tourist regions. University of Texas Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004728757301100306
Han, H., Nguyen, H., & Chua, B. L. (2022). Environmental responsibility and visitor perception in island destinations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 373, 133982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133982
Hosany, S., & Prayag, G. (2023). Destination image and tourist behavior: Contemporary perspectives. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(2), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2022.2112547
Kattan, H., Al-Bayari, K., & Al-Hussaini, A. (2023). Accessibility as a determinant of destination attractiveness. Tourism Geographies, 25(3), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2022.2145678
Kim, D., Ritchie, B., & McCormick, A. (2024). Measuring experience quality in nature-based tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives, 51, 101187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2024.101187
Kozak, M., & Decrop, A. (2022b). Cross-cultural differences in tourism behavior. Annals of Tourism Research, 95, 103245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2022.103245
Lee, S., & Hwang, J. (2022). The impact of natural attractions on destination loyalty. International Journal of Tourism Research, 24(4), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2489
Li, Y., Liu, B., & Wang, Y. (2022). Age differences in travel motivation and perception. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 39(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2022.2098765
Marques, M., & Reis, M. (2023). Gender-based differences in travel motivations and destination perceptions. Tourism Review, 78(2), 542–558. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-08-2022-0365
Neuburger, L., & Egger, R. (2021). Revisiting a destination: How repeat visitation shapes tourists’ perception of attractions versus basic destination services. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29, 1342–1358. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09669582.2020.1867942
Pennington-Gray, L., & Holden, A. (2021). Family life cycle and tourism choices. Journal of Family Tourism. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01669-6_438-2
Philippines Department of Tourism. (2023). Love the Philippines: National tourism brand report. https://www.dotr.gov.ph/love-the-philippines
Prayag, G., & Ryan, C. (2023). Destination image and tourist behavior: An updated review. Journal of Travel Research, 62(5), 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875221144567
Prideaux, B., Law, R., & Chon, K. (2021). Transport and tourism: The role of accessibility in destination development. Journal of Transport Geography, 96, 102856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.102856
Ramsey, D., & Everitt, J. (2023). Infrastructure and amenities as predictors of tourist satisfaction. Tourism Geographies, 25(5), 1234–1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2022.2156789
Rather, R. A., Hollebeek, L. D., & Rasoolimanesh, S. M. (2021). First-time versus repeat tourism customer engagement, experience, and value cocreation: An empirical investigation. Journal of Travel Research, 61(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287521997572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287521997572
Rico, M., & Cosgapa, R. (2025). Perception and satisfaction in the Caraga Region. Mindanao Journal of Tourism Studies.
Stylidis, D., Woosnam, K. M., & Kim, S. (2022). Perceptions of attractions, residents as “more knowledgeable others” and destination image: Evidence from two destinations. International Journal of Tourism Research, 24(3), 472–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2515
Sustainable Interventions for Biodiversity, Oceans, and Landscapes (SIBOL) Project. (2024). Preferences and experiences of users of recreation: Ecosystem services in Siargao Island Protected Landscape and Seascape (SIPLAS) [Technical report]. https://faspselib.denr.gov.ph/Materials/Detail/e9e72a3f-0c52-4c8b-aa00-2bd0859245d2?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Tek-Ing, T. (2022). Siargao named Asia’s greatest island. Condé Nast Traveler. https://www.cntraveler.com
Wang, Y., Li, X., & Li, S. (2021). Social media marketing and perceived value in tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(12), 4123–4140. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2021-0324
Wong, S. (2025). Assessing tourists’ perceptions at San Francisco, Agusan del Sur: Basis for destination image development. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope. https://www.irjms.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Manuscript_IRJMS_07063_WS.pdf
Wu, H. C., Li, T., & Li, M. Y. (2022). Service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty: An update. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(13–14), 1567–1584. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2021.1923456
Wu, J., Zhang, H., & Fu, X. (2023). First-time versus repeat visitors: Differences in perceived value, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 29, 100897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2023.100897
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lady Zhanine U. Cabadongga, Hiezel Mae G. Trazona, Rusannit G. Abadiez, Joann C. Opon, Mejean D. Noguerra, Maria Lelanie A. Goyonan, PhD (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. This license permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
