Enhancing Pilot Skills: The Effectiveness of Preflight Simulation Training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsis.V1.I2.62Keywords:
Aviation Safety, Flight Readiness, Flight Simulation, Pre-Flight Simulation Training, Simulation-Based Learning, Situational Awareness, Technical CompetenceAbstract
This study examined the perceived effectiveness of pre-flight simulation training in developing the competencies of student pilots at Indiana Aerospace University, particularly in relation to flight readiness, knowledge of aircraft systems and procedures, decision-making, reaction time, situational awareness, multitasking, maneuver proficiency, safety, error reduction, and preparation for actual flight conditions. The study was informed by experiential learning, cognitive load, behavioral learning, situated learning, schema, deliberate practice, and transfer-of-learning perspectives that explain how simulation, repetition, feedback, and realistic practice may support competency development. A quantitative descriptive survey design was employed using a survey questionnaire administered to 110 randomly selected senior high school and college Aviation Technology Major in Flying students. Data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, and weighted mean. Results showed consistently high perceived effectiveness of pre-flight simulation training across the assessed competencies. Flight readiness and willingness to recommend simulation training obtained the highest weighted means of 4.88, followed by its perceived contribution to aviation safety at 4.79 and instructor guidance at 4.76. Availability of sufficient simulator practice time received the lowest, although still high, weighted mean of 4.42, indicating a potential area for institutional attention. Overall, respondents perceived simulation training as beneficial for strengthening knowledge, technical competencies, emergency preparedness, confidence, safety awareness, and readiness for real-world flight conditions. The study recommends further integration of structured simulation activities, instructor guidance, feedback, updated training technologies, and continuing simulation exposure in aviation education, while future research should examine long-term skill retention and objectively measured flight performance. The study primarily supports SDG 4—Quality Education and SDG 9—Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, with a secondary connection to SDG 8—Decent Work and Economic Growth. Its sustainability impact lies in strengthening educational, technological, institutional, safety, and workforce development practices within aviation training.
References
Allerton, D. J. (2010). The impact of flight simulation in aerospace. The Aeronautical Journal, 114(1162), 747–756. DOI: 10.1017/S0001924000004231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000004231
Bakken, B., Gould, J., & Kim, D. (1992). Experimentation in learning organizations: A management flight simulator approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 59(1), 167–182. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90013-Y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(92)90013-Y
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Beckman, W. S. (2013). The effectiveness of Microsoft Flight Simulator as a training aid for private pilot training and proficiency. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 38–43). Wright State University.
Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines. (n.d.). Training Organization Certification and Inspection Division (TOCID). Licensing and Certification Department.
Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines. (2026, March 13). CAAP strengthens collaboration with training organizations at ATO Summit 2026.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
Fussell, S. G., & Truong, D. (2020). Preliminary results of a study investigating aviation student’s intentions to use virtual reality for flight training. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 7(3), Article 2. DOI: 10.15394/ijaaa.2020.1504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2020.1504
Goetz, S., Harrison, B., & Robertson, M. (2012). Use of simulation in visual flight training: The effect on time to solo. Collegiate Aviation Review, 30(2), 1–10. DOI: 10.22488/okstate.18.100431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.18.100431
Hajian, S. (2019). Transfer of learning and teaching: A review of transfer theories and effective instructional practices. IAFOR Journal of Education, 7(1), 93–111. DOI: 10.22492/ije.7.1.06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.7.1.06
Hight, M. P., Fussell, S. G., Kurkchubasche, M. A., & Hummell, I. J. (2022). Effectiveness of virtual reality simulations for civilian, ab initio pilot training. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 31(1), Article 1. DOI: 10.15394/jaaer.2022.1903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15394/jaaer.2022.1903
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2020). Procedures for Air Navigation Services—Training (PANS-TRG) (Doc 9868) (3rd ed.). International Civil Aviation Organization.
Koglbauer, I. V., & Braunstingl, R. (2018). Ab initio pilot training for traffic separation and visual airport procedures in a naturalistic flight simulation environment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.023
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
Kozuba, J., & Sładkowski, A. (2019). Simulators as an essential tool for shaping the competence of the aviation personnel. In T. Shmelova, Y. Sikirda, N. Rizun, D. Kucherov, & K. Dergachov (Eds.), Automated systems in the aviation and aerospace industries (pp. 72–114). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-7709-6.ch003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7709-6.ch003
Kurra, P. (2024, December 14). From ground school to sky: AirLink’s comprehensive pilot training path. AirLink Flight School.
Landman, A., van Oorschot, P., van Paassen, M. M. R., Groen, E. L., Bronkhorst, A. W., & Mulder, M. (2018). Training pilots for unexpected events: A simulator study on the advantage of unpredictable and variable scenarios. Human Factors, 60(6), 793–805. DOI: 10.1177/0018720818779928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818779928
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lu, T., Lou, Z., Shao, F., Li, Y., & You, X. (2020). Attention and entropy in simulated flight with varying cognitive loads. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 91(6), 489–495. DOI: 10.3357/AMHP.5504.2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.5504.2020
Paul, N., Moncion, B., & Cao, S. (2025). An experimental comparison on the effectiveness of various levels of simulator fidelity on ab initio pilot training. Ergonomics, 68(12), 2029–2045. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2024.2449110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2449110
Prayitno, H., Ekohariadi, Cholik, M., Suprianto, B., & Qiram, I. (2023). Impact of flight simulator training on enhancing situational awareness among aviation vocational education cadets. In 2023 International Conference of Computer Science and Information Technology (ICOSNIKOM). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICoSNIKOM60230.2023.10364549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoSNIKOM60230.2023.10364549
Rosa, E., Dahlstrom, N., Knez, I., Ljung, R., Cameron, M., & Willander, J. (2021). Dynamic decision-making of airline pilots in low-fidelity simulation. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 22(1), 83–102. DOI: 10.1080/1463922X.2020.1758830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2020.1758830
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. The Free Press.
Somerville, A., Joiner, K., Lynar, T., & Wild, G. (2025). Applications of extended reality in pilot flight simulator training: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art, 8, Article 25. DOI: 10.1186/s42492-025-00206-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-025-00206-w
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261–292. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2026). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2026. United Nations.
White, M. D., Padfield, G. D., Lu, L., Advani, S., & Potter, M. (2021). Review of flight simulation fidelity requirements to help reduce ‘rotorcraft loss of control in-flight’ accident rates. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 12, 701–721. DOI: 10.1007/s13272-021-00542-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-021-00542-6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Jason D. Baguio (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. This license permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
