Academic Experiences and Best Practices in Utilizing AI-Powered Learning Tools: Inputs to Policy Framework Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsis.V1.I2.69Keywords:
Academic Experiences, Artificial Intelligence, Best Practices, Educational Technology, Learning Engagement, Policy Development, Technology Integration, AI-Powered ToolsAbstract
This study investigated the academic experiences and best practices of students and teachers in utilizing AI-powered tools in the Schools Division of Santiago City and aimed to generate evidence-based inputs for policy development. The study was guided by the Human–AI Interaction Theory, Technology Integration and Implementation Framework, and Learner Technology Appropriation Theory, which explain AI adoption, technology integration, and users’ engagement with AI-supported learning environments. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed, beginning with quantitative data collection through a structured Likert-type survey questionnaire, followed by qualitative interviews to further explain participants’ experiences, perceived benefits, and challenges. The respondents consisted of Grade 12 senior high school students and teachers from selected schools in the division who had experience using AI-powered tools for academic and instructional purposes. Results showed that students perceived AI-powered tools as beneficial in supporting academic tasks, improving time management, reducing cognitive load, and enhancing learning engagement. Teachers likewise reported that AI tools improved instructional preparation, teaching effectiveness, and professional efficiency. However, challenges were identified, including concerns on ethical use, dependence on AI, accuracy of AI-generated outputs, limited policy clarity, infrastructure constraints, and the need for continuous AI-related training and guidance. The study concluded that AI-powered tools can positively contribute to teaching and learning when implemented responsibly and supported by appropriate institutional policies. This study aligns with Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education) by supporting innovative, inclusive, and improved educational practices. It also contributes to sustainable educational governance by providing evidence-based policy inputs for ethical and responsible AI integration in schools.
References
Alarcon, G., Garcia, M., & Lantican, J. (2021). Impact of AI-powered tutoring systems on student engagement and learning outcomes during remote learning in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1), 55–71.
Aldea, L. (2021). Enhancing student engagement through AI-powered learning tools in higher education: A Philippine case study. Asian Journal of Education and Technology, 12(3), 92–104.
Aleven, V., Beal, C. R., & Graesser, A. C. (2013). Handbook of educational psychology and AI in education.
Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70.
Baker, T., & Smith, L. (2019). Educ-AI-tion rebooted? Exploring the future of AI in schools. Nesta.
Brush, T., & Saye, J. W. (2001). The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student-centered learning.
Cohen, L., & Rupp, A. (2020). Ethical concerns of AI in education: The implications for data privacy and bias. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 15–26.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 325–346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
Dela Cruz, M., Reyes, J., & Tan, P. (2020). Closing the educational gap with AI-powered learning tools in the Philippine public school system. Journal of Educational Innovation, 10(4), 123–136.
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K–12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Lee, M. J. W., & Koh, J. H. L. (2020). The challenges and prospects of artificial intelligence in education. Educational Research Review, 30, Article 100327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100327
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
Marcelo, E. (2024, October 26). DepEd studying policy on use of AI in schools. The Philippine Star. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2024/10/26/2395424/deped-studying-policy-use-ai-schools
Philippine Business for Education. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The future of learning in the Philippines. PBEd Report.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Salazar, R. (2022). Teacher support through AI-driven tools in the Philippine classroom. Educational Research and Development Journal, 27(2), 67–79.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1511588
Sison, M., Torres, H., & Cabrera, J. (2022). Barriers to AI adoption in Philippine schools: A comprehensive study. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 25(1), 134–146.
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Villano, M. (2020). The digital divide and AI in education: Challenges and opportunities in rural Philippine schools. TechEd Asia, 8(3), 22–38.
Williamson, B. (2017). The future of education and technology: The role of artificial intelligence in education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 46–58.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence in education: Towards an agenda for the future. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 1077–1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09796-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abegail Alangue Calimag (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. This license permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
