A Multidimensional Analysis of Mathematical Thinking Beliefs among Mathematics Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsis.V1.I2.83Keywords:
Constructivist Learning Theory, Mathematical Communication, Mathematical Connection, Mathematical Representation, Mathematical Thinking Beliefs, Problem Solving, Reasoning and Proof, Secondary Mathematics TeachersAbstract
This study examined the mathematical thinking beliefs of secondary mathematics teachers in the Sta. Maria District during the school year 2026–2027, focusing on problem solving, mathematical representation, reasoning and proof, mathematical communication, and mathematical connection. It also determined differences in these beliefs according to sex and years of teaching experience and examined the relationships among the five dimensions. The study was anchored in teachers’ beliefs, the NCTM Process Standards, and Constructivist Learning Theory. A quantitative descriptive-comparative-correlational and cross-sectional survey design was employed. Using total enumeration, all 41 public secondary mathematics teachers from six schools participated. Data were collected using the 23-item Mathematical Thinking Beliefs (MTB) questionnaire and analyzed through weighted mean, analysis of variance, and Pearson’s product-moment correlation. The findings revealed a very high overall extent of mathematical thinking beliefs, with a grand mean of 4.68. Mathematical representation obtained the highest mean of 4.71, followed by problem solving at 4.70, reasoning and proof and mathematical communication at 4.68, and mathematical connection at 4.65. No significant differences were found according to sex (p = .062) or length of service (p = .438). All ten relationships among the five dimensions were positive and statistically significant, with the strongest relationship occurring between problem solving and mathematical connection (r = 0.884). The study concluded that mathematical thinking beliefs function as strongly interconnected components and recommended continued professional development, collaborative learning, reflective activities, and classroom practices that strengthen all five dimensions. The study supports SDG 4: Quality Education by contributing evidence for improving mathematics instruction and teachers’ capacity to promote meaningful and higher-order learning. Its sustainability impact is primarily educational and institutional, as the findings may guide curriculum implementation, instructional leadership, and sustained teacher professional development.
References
Ablian, J. D. P., Aquis, A. B., Mendoza, L. F., Devera, R. D., Famularcano, J. L. D., & Dumlao, P. M. D. (2025). Belief system theory in learning mathematics: The case of basic education in the Philippines. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v15i1.26271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v15i1.26271
Albano, G., Antonini, S., & Miranda, A. (2024). Digital experiences of mathematical cognitive functions in learning the basic concepts of general topology. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 10, 823–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-024-00245-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-024-00245-3
Alhunaini, S., Osman, K., & Abdurab, N. (2021). The development and validation of mathematical thinking beliefs (MTB) instrument. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(11), em2024. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11213
Amoranto, C., & Manalaysay, E. (2025). Predicting success in pre-calculus: The role of self-efficacy, math anxiety, and perception among STEM students. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 48(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.480209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.480209
Anore, M., Cordevilla, R. P., Nabor, E., Lumbay, A., Jr., & Uy, A. (2025). Grit, metacognitive awareness, and mathematics achievement among junior and senior high school students. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 49(7), 880–892. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.490703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.490703
Anugraheni, I., Gufron, A., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2025). The impact of realistic problem-based learning on mathematical connection abilities: Evidence from elementary schools in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2523078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2523078
Barrot, J. S. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in mathematics instruction in Philippine secondary schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(4), 613–626.
Bautista, W., & Dones, Q. (2025). Numeracy skills and attitude towards mathematics of students in relation to performance: Basis for intervention program. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 33(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.330204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.330204
Bernados, F. M. D., Bayug, J. B., De Castro, C. S., De Castro, D. S., & Dela Cruz, J. M. M. (2025). Design and development of problem-solving activities in the 21st century teaching and learning process. PANTAO: The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 1250–1255. https://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0402114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0402114
Bernardo, A. B. I., & Mendoza, R. (2022). Teacher beliefs and the implementation of learner-centered pedagogies in Philippine classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 115, 103712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103712
Boaler, J. (2022). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative mathematics. Jossey-Bass.
Bravo-Sotelo, K. P., McLellan, J., & Haji-Othman, N. A. (2026). Brokering content communication through translanguaging: Teachers’ discursive practices in Philippine EMI online mathematics classrooms. The Language Learning Journal, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2025.2612179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2025.2612179
Cagape, K., & Fuentibilla, R. (2025). Application of math productivity software in a system of linear equations and inequalities and students’ graphing skills in mathematics 8. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 36(6), 637–649. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.360603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.360603
Cai, J., Hwang, S., Jiang, C., & Silber, S. (2020). Problem solving and mathematical representation in mathematics education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10079-5
Catunhay, R. A., Jr., Piñero, B. S., & Futalan, M. Z. (2025). Mathematical dispositions and problem-solving abilities using the IDEAL model. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(7), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.316
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG mathematics curriculum guide.
Domingo, J. (2025). Development and evaluation of contextualized learning materials in mathematics 7. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(5), 697–704. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13823382
Duong, H. T., Tang, M. D., Vo, X. M., Nguyen, T.-T., Kholid, M. N., Hoang, N. T., Bui, P. U., & Le, M. T. V. (2025). In-service mathematics teachers’ beliefs and instructional practices in integrating ICTs into teaching: A systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(4), Article ep598. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/17321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/17321
Duval, R. (2021). Representation, vision and visualization: Cognitive functions in mathematical thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(1), 1–17.
Espera, J. R., & Sanchez, R. (2025). Mediating roles of mathematics motivation and mathematics anxiety on the relationship between mathematics self-efficacy and numeracy of the students. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 47(5), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.470509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.470509
Esteves, S. L. C., Dullas, L. D., & Rivera, R. A. (2026). Contextualized teaching in general mathematics: Students’ perceptions and attitudes toward problem solving. Journal of Education, Learning, and Management, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.69739/jelm.v3i1.1316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69739/jelm.v3i1.1316
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2022). How to design and evaluate research in education (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Garcia, P. A., & Roleda, L. S. (2025). Linguistic practices in mathematics classrooms: A needs analysis toward translingual mathematics education. Education Mind, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.58583/em.4.1.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58583/EM.4.1.6
Godes, J. K., Oledan, A. M., Luib, J. R., Saromines, C. J., & Gandamra, H. (2025). The role of mathematical communication through think-pair-share in developing problem-solving skills. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Science, 9(5), 93–97.
Gonzales, A. G., Joaquin, M. N. B., & Monterola, S. L. C. (2023). Characterizing the application of mathematical thinking in citizen science. Philippine Journal of Education Studies, 1(1), 110–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61839/29848180a7m8s9
Gonzalvo, I., & Palomares, N. (2025). Learning gaps in mathematics 7 and teachers’ instructional strategies in selected public secondary schools in the second congressional district of Quezon. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 48(3), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.480303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.480303
Gregorio, R. O., & Marasigan, J. L. S. (2025). Filipino preservice mathematics teachers' mathematical values. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 3(11), 780–794. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17735047
Hatisaru, V. (2025). New insights into the beliefs of secondary pre-service teachers about mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16656
Hiebert, J., Morris, A., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. (2021). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching: A framework for improving classroom instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(3), 239–256.
Hwang, S., Cai, J., & Silber, S. (2021). Mathematical representation and problem solving in mathematics classrooms. ZDM: Mathematics Education, 53(1), 1–13.
Ibañez, A. M. (2025). Learning activity sheet (LAS) on the proficiency level in mathematical reasoning of grade 10 students. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 42(2), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.420209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.420209
Ignacio, A. G., Jr. (2024). Exploring the perspectives of preservice Filipino mathematics teachers: Basis for a proposed educational belief model. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.487
Inglis, M., Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Simpson, A. (2022). Mathematical argumentation and reasoning in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(2), 215–233.
Iringan, E. M. (2021). Instructional practices of teachers in integrating critical thinking and problem solving skills in mathematics instruction. Journal of Education, Teaching and Social Studies, 3(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.22158/jetss.v3n1p28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22158/jetss.v3n1p28
Jabagat, A. S., Llido, B. B., & Godinez, C. D. (2025). Understanding the relationship of pre-service teachers’ beliefs in math and teaching practices: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods approach. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 6(4), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2025.6.4.947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2025.6.4.947
Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2021). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(1), 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9761-8
Junaid, A. (2025). Enhancing problem-solving skills in secondary mathematics education through collaborative learning. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(9), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.230
Kazemi, E., Hintz, A., & Jackson, K. (2021). Intentional talk: How to structure and lead productive mathematical discussions (2nd ed.). Stenhouse.
Kholid, M. N., & Aisyah, N. N. (2025). Classification of abstract thinking in solving mathematical problems. Educational Process: International Journal, 16, Article e2025194. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.16.194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.16.194
Li, R. (2024). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs about their roles in cooperative learning and instructional scaffolding practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 115(2), 235–252.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.
Lithner, J. (2020). Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance creative reasoning. ZDM: Mathematics Education, 52(4), 697–709.
Lloyd, G. M., Wilson, M., & Wilkins, J. (2022). Teacher beliefs and the teaching of mathematics: A contemporary review. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(5), 567–586.
Mashuri, S., Tahmir, S., Talib, A., & Ihsan, H. (2025). Problem-based learning in mathematics education: A bibliometric analysis of key trends and future directions in the last decade. Educational Process: International Journal, 18, Article e2025419. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.18.419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.18.419
Melchor, J. M., & Parcutilo, J. O. (2025). Preparedness of Filipino math teachers for Generation Alpha: Development and validation of a readiness scale. American Journal of Educational Research, 13(4), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-13-4-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12691/education-13-4-1
Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Major, L. (2020). The dialogic classroom: Developing students’ reasoning through classroom talk. Educational Review, 72(5), 1–19.
Mindalano, R. C., & Baldonado, C. E. (2025). Discursive style in teaching mathematics: Its impact on Grade Three pupils’ performance. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 46(2), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.460207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.460207
Moyano, N. M., & Andrade, R. R. (2025). Integration of place-based education for fostering the problem-solving skills of grade 9 students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research, 6(6), 3150–3162. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.06.36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.06.36
Muñoz, E. C. (2024). Impact of school experiences on the beliefs and instructional practices of future mathematics teachers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15201
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Osman, S., Kaur, A., & Ibrahim, M. (2021). Development and validation of the mathematical thinking beliefs scale. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(5), e1951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11213
Özaltun Çelik, A., & Bukova Guzel, E. (2024). Expanding on knowledge of student thinking through mathematics teachers’ engagement in lesson study. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 5(2), 371–398. https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1576727 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1576727
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257–318). Information Age Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-28141-200-320251010
Picat, R., & Natividad, E. (2023). Contextualized interactive learning materials (CILMs) for mathematics 1. Divine Word International Journal of Management and Humanities, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.62025/dwijmh.v2i3.34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62025/dwijmh.v2i3.34
Radford, L. (2021). The theory of objectification: A perspective on mathematical learning and teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(2), 173–190.
Radišić, J., Buchholtz, N., Yang-Hansen, K., Liu, X., & Kaarstein, H. (2024). Do teachers’ beliefs about the nature and learning of mathematics affect students’ motivation and enjoyment of mathematics? Examining differences between boys and girls across six countries. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39, 1587–1613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00809-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00809-6
Saliao, M. D., & Cajandig, A. J. S. (2025). Integration of technology in teaching mathematics: Assessing the influence of digital pedagogy on learning engagement and achievement among Grade 8 students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(4), 4476–4493. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90400320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90400320
Salinas, C. S. (2025). Mathematical problem-solving skills through REACT strategy. SARIRIT: The University Research Journal, 14(2, Special Issue), 13–19.
Santos-Trigo, M. (2024). Problem solving in mathematics education: Tracing its foundations and current research-practice trends. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01578-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01578-8
Skott, J., Van Zoest, L., & Törner, G. (2021). Mathematics teacher beliefs: Current developments and directions for research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(2), 1–18.
Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2020). Reasoning and proof in mathematics education: Recent developments. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(3), 255–273.
Sun, D. (2024). Evolution of teachers’ teaching beliefs about mathematics in teacher education programs. Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), 215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100934
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
Tancontian, A. O., Abina, I. L. S., & Evardo, O. J., Jr. (2024). Indigenous people mathematics teachers’ beliefs and teaching practices: An explanatory sequential analysis. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(6), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0087
Weber, K., Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Inglis, M. (2021). Mathematical reasoning and proof in undergraduate mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 52(3), 305–336.
Wilkins, J. L. M., & Norton, A. (2021). The relationship between mathematics teachers’ beliefs and instructional practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(6), 567–589.
Yang, J., Özbek, G., & Cho, S. (2023). Teachers’ beliefs and their influence on math instructions for gifted English learners. Education Sciences, 13(7), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070728
Yang, Y., Kaiser, G., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2023). Teachers’ professional competence and classroom discourse in mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 120, 103896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103896
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Cisel Lorenzo Subrado, Dr. Joselito Ignacio (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. This license permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
